Detection of calcified plaques: comparison between coronary CT angiography and thin-slice non-contrast CT with deep learning-aided image registration

Résumé fourni par la source

Objectives: To investigate whether coronary CT angiography (CCTA) misses calcified plaques detected by thin-slice non-contrast CT (NCCT). Materials and methods: This study included patients from two sites in the DISCHARGE trial for whom both 0.5 mm thin-slice NCCT and CCTA were available. Plaques on CCTA were defined as missed if they showed no spatial overlap with NCCT-detected plaques after deep learning-aided co-registration. Comparisons of plaque volume, density, and local coronary luminal attenuation between plaques missed and those detected by CCTA were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. In addition, the presence of these plaques on standard calcium scoring CT was assessed. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland‒Altman analysis. Results: This study included 45 patients (40% female, mean age 62 ± 11 years), in whom CCTA missed 37.6% of calcified plaques detected by NCCT (121/322). Missing calcified plaques on CCTA misclassified 8.9% of patients (4/45) as having no plaques. Compared with detected plaques, plaques missed by CCTA were both significantly smaller in volume (3.0 mm³ [IQR, 1.5–4.9] vs. 9.2 mm³ [IQR, 4.3–21.9], p < 0.001) and had lower density (212.7 HU [IQR, 174.5–242.4] vs. 292.7 HU [IQR, 243.2–361.3], p < 0.001). Only 44.0% of plaques (53/121) missed by CCTA were detected by standard calcium scoring CT. Interobserver analysis demonstrated excellent agreement for calcified plaque volume on CCTA (ICC = 0.91) and NCCT (ICC = 0.98). Conclusion: CCTA missed more than one-third of coronary calcified plaques that are identifiable on co-registered thin-slice NCCT, which suggests an underutilized role of thin-slice NCCT in clinical practice.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.