Salvage Hepatectomy in Toxic Liver Syndrome as a Bridge to Orthotopic Liver Retransplantation—Case Series and Structured Narrative Review
Résumé fourni par la source
Background/Objectives: Salvage hepatectomy with a prolonged anhepatic phase represents a potential life-saving strategy in patients with toxic liver syndrome (TLS) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Available evidence is limited to small case series. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing OLT between 2014 and 2024 at a German transplant center. Among 497 patients, 33 required retransplantation, including four patients who underwent salvage hepatectomy due to refractory TLS. Clinical trajectories were analyzed descriptively. Additionally, a structured narrative review of the literature was performed. Results: Median age was 63 years (range 62–67), and median anhepatic time was 38.4 h (range 14.39–71.55). No patient died during the anhepatic phase. One patient died during retransplantation, and another during the postoperative course. Two patients survived long-term without neurological impairment. A literature review identified 30 relevant studies with reported mortality rates exceeding 50%. Conclusions: Salvage hepatectomy with subsequent retransplantation may serve as a life-saving bridge in selected patients with TLS. However, outcomes remain heterogeneous, and evidence is limited. This study provides detailed insights into perioperative physiological trajectories and clinical decision-making, which are insufficiently described in the current literature.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Salvage Hepatectomy in Toxic Liver Syndrome as a Bridge to Orthotopic Liver Retransplantation—Case Series and Structured Narrative Review
- Date Crossref
- 09/05/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.