Vitamin D and Vitamin B12 in Psychiatric Disorders: An Exploratory Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nutrient-Specific Status and Supplementation Evidence
Rattachement africain : ro. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background/Objectives: Evidence linking vitamins D and B12 to psychiatric outcomes remains heterogeneous across designs, populations, phenotypes, exposures, and outcome formats. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA 2020 systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of nutrient-specific status and supplementation evidence. PubMed/MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ProQuest were searched for human studies published in 2016–2025, with a final update on 1 March 2026. Forty-six studies were included (24 randomized controlled trials, 22 observational studies; N = 69,902), and 44 contributed quantitative data. Effects were harmonized to odds ratios (ORs) for cross-family comparability and pooled using Hartung–Knapp random-effects models; supplementation evidence was additionally interpreted on the standardized mean difference (SMD) scale. Results: Across the main evidence families, pooled estimates showed substantial heterogeneity and limited generalizability. Vitamin D supplementation showed an initial inverse estimate on the secondary harmonized OR scale (OR = 0.439, 95% CI 0.272–0.710) and a clinically interpretable SMD of −0.454 (95% CI −0.718 to −0.189), but heterogeneity was high (I2 = 84.2%) and trim-and-fill attenuated the OR estimate to the null (OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.48–1.63). Vitamin D status showed a similar pattern (primary OR = 0.615, 95% CI 0.424–0.890; trim-and-fill OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.54–1.49). Vitamin B12 status was inversely associated with outcomes (OR = 0.310, 95% CI 0.115–0.834), but heterogeneity was extreme (I2 = 94.8%). B12 supplementation evidence was sparse and null. Conclusions: The evidence supports targeted deficiency assessment, not routine supplementation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Vitamin D and Vitamin B12 in Psychiatric Disorders: An Exploratory Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nutrient-Specific Status and Supplementation Evidence
- Date Crossref
- 10/05/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.