Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Ecosystem restoration and protected and conserved areas as complementary conservation strategies

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : bd, gb, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Protected and conserved areas and ecosystem restoration are key strategies for the conservation of life. Yet, in practice, they are not always closely aligned. Our purpose here is to improve the ability of conservation decision-makers and practitioners to integrate protected and conserved areas and restoration as complementary strategies to achieve broader conservation objectives. Protected and conserved areas can act as reference landscapes and seascapes for restoration, laboratories for restoration, sources of restoration material, vehicles for passive restoration and sites for targeted restoration. But protected and conserved areas themselves may require restoration (within their boundaries, in their buffer zones and between them), as a result of prior degradation, degradation after designation or recognition, and as a result of climate and other environmental changes. Harnessing these interlinkages, we argue, makes political, social, economic and ecological sense. Furthermore, it supports the achievement of multiple objectives, including those related to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, UN Convention to Combat Desertification and the Convention on Biological Diversity. We make six recommendations: (1) Better align restoration and protections plans; (2) insert restoration directly in protected and conserved area management plans where needed; (3) expand spatial planning approaches that include both protection and restoration; (4) promote joint task forces, projects, programmes and strategies that can help better deliver protection and restoration; (5) secure mutual benefits to people and nature as these are essential for sustainability of both protection and restoration interventions; and (6) align objectives for protection and restoration so they can make significant contributions to the delivery of critical ecosystem services such as food security and climate adaptation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Ecosystem restoration and protected and conserved areas as complementary conservation strategies
Date Crossref
11/05/2026
Éditeur
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and BeyondRangeland and Wildlife Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.