Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

60 Post-deployment artificial intelligence model monitoring, evaluation, and intervention in health systems: A scoping review for guidelines for AI model report and the literature

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objectives/Goals: This scoping review aims to synthesize current literature on post-deployment monitoring of AI-enabled digital health solutions within clinical practice. Findings identify existing approaches and gaps that inform guidance for post-deployment monitoring in clinical practice. Methods/Study Population: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines to characterize the current landscape of post-deployment monitoring in healthcare systems. A PubMed search targeted peer-reviewed articles in English published between 2015 and mid-2025, including text or MeSH terms on 1) health system/hospital; 2) artificial intelligence; 3) post-deployment; and 4) evaluation/monitoring. We performed a thematic analysis to identify common challenges, gaps, and opportunities in AI oversight. Additionally, we reviewed guidelines addressing post-deployment AI monitoring. All analyses were conducted using Rayyan.ai and Microsoft Word. Results/Anticipated Results: Among the six studies included after the full-text review, five provide recommendations to ensure transparency, safety, and model performance. These recommendations encompassed monitoring model performance and real-time case report, post-market surveillance, adverse event reporting, end-user training, data standardization and documentation, and interdisciplinary collaboration. One study reports a framework for post-deployment impact grading. Currently, no guidelines addressing post-deployment of AI monitoring in health systems exist. Our findings highlight the urgent need for structured post-deployment processes to ensure AI in healthcare systems is safe, effective, and trustworthy. Discussion/Significance of Impact: The absence of post-deployment guidelines raises concerns. This review underscores the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to establish a post-deployment monitoring process with scientific rigor, scalability, and sustainability that aligns with operational realities.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
60 Post-deployment artificial intelligence model monitoring, evaluation, and intervention in health systems: A scoping review for guidelines for AI model report and the literature
Date Crossref
01/04/2026
Éditeur
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationElectronic Health Records SystemsHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.