Community-based health-focused longitudinal aging studies in East and Southeast Asia: landscape and future directions
Rattachement africain : sg, us, cn, ph, th, jp, ca, my, hk, se, kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
East and Southeast Asia's (ESEA) rapidly aging population creates an urgent need for comprehensive health data to inform policies promoting healthy aging. However, a synthesis of the region's community-based longitudinal aging studies is lacking. We conducted a systematic search for community-based longitudinal aging studies in ESEA. Studies were included if they followed community-dwelling adults with a mean age of 50+ at baseline, had nationally representative samples or sampled from at least two geographic areas, were health focused, and offered English documentation. We identified 30 eligible studies across 10 countries, regions, or territories, mostly concentrated in Japan, Mainland China, Singapore, and South Korea. While recent studies incorporate biomarkers and performance measurements, significant gaps were found. No eligible studies exist for several countries (e.g., Myanmar, Cambodia, and Indonesia), physical frailty is rarely assessed, data access is inconsistent, and no multi-national studies were identified. Although data infrastructure for longitudinal aging studies exists in ESEA, there are critical gaps in geographic representation, measurement harmonization, and data access. Future efforts must enhance regional coordination, standardize core measures, and improve data-sharing mechanisms to promote and support healthy aging in ESEA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Community-based health-focused longitudinal aging studies in East and Southeast Asia: landscape and future directions
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.