Multimodal support for cardiorespiratory failure from paradoxical coronary and pulmonary embolism: A case report of mechanical support, revascularization, embolectomy, and shunt closure
Rattachement africain : us, bd. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Paradoxical coronary embolism (PCE) is an uncommon cause of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), typically occurring when venous thromboemboli cross a right-to-left shunt in the setting of elevated right-sided pressures. We report a case of mixed obstructive and cardiogenic shock caused by simultaneous pulmonary embolism (PE) and PCE. A previously healthy 43-year-old woman developed profound hypoxemia and inferior ST-segment elevation 3 days after knee surgery. Coronary angiography revealed distal right coronary artery occlusion, successfully treated with aspiration thrombectomy and percutaneous coronary intervention. Persistent hypoxemia, right ventricular injury, and hemodynamic collapse prompted initiation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). Subsequent imaging identified extensive bilateral PE and a patent foramen ovale with significant right-to-left shunting. Catheter-based pulmonary embolectomy improved cardiopulmonary function, followed by percutaneous PFO closure. She recovered fully and was discharged home neurologically intact. This case highlights the importance of early recognition, appropriate ECMO configuration, and comprehensive management of PCE with concurrent PE.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Multimodal support for cardiorespiratory failure from paradoxical coronary and pulmonary embolism: A case report of mechanical support, revascularization, embolectomy, and shunt closure
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.