Who wants to pay more taxes for better long-term care services: evidence from OECD surveys
Rattachement africain : ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: This study examines the factors influencing individuals' willingness to pay higher taxes to support long-term care (LTC) services, a pressing issue as aging populations drive rising LTC demand and public spending. METHODS: We use data from the 2020 and 2022 waves of the OECD's "Risk that Matter" survey, a cross-national survey examining people's perceptions of the social and economic risks they face. We employ generalized linear mixed-effects models configured as logistic regression models, including country-level random intercepts and country-level covariates. We also conduct standard logit regressions for individual countries to analyze local nuances further. RESULTS: The findings reveal that higher income, older age, female gender, left-leaning political orientation, and caregiving responsibilities significantly increase the likelihood of willingness to pay for improved LTC services. At the country level, greater LTC spending as a share of GDP, higher trust in government, and policies offering cash benefits to carers also play a significant role. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results indicate strong support for additional LTC funding among sizeable demographic groups, especially older respondents and those in higher-income groups. At the same time, political orientation and certain socio-demographic characteristics are associated with differences in support. These findings are relevant for policymakers considering reforms to improve the provision of LTC services.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Who wants to pay more taxes for better long-term care services: evidence from OECD surveys
- Date Crossref
- 06/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.