Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 conference-abstract

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1097 PREVENTIVE INTERVENTION VS PLACEBO IN CHRONIC MIGRAINE: A META ANALYSIS

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background and aims Chronic migraine (CM) is a disabling neurological disorder affecting approximately 1.4–2.2% of the population and imposing substantial personal and healthcare burdens. Preventive treatments demonstrate variable efficacy,. The magnitude and variability of the placebo effect across CM trials have not, to date, been characterized. To evaluate the clinical significance and variability of the placebo effect in CM through a systematic meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in Nested Knowledge, searching PubMed, Ovid, Science Direct and Cochrane through October 2025. Randomized phase III placebo-controlled trials including prophylactic treatment of CM were included. Primary outcomes were Mean Migraine Days (MMDs) and Mean Headache Days (MHDs); secondary outcomes included Migraine disability assessment (MIDAS), 50% reduction of MMDs and reduction in use of Acute medication (AM). Results Of 1,717 screened records, 14 trials met inclusion criteria. Preventive therapies significantly reduced MMDs and MHDs versus placebo from Weeks 4–12 (p<0.05), indicating early and sustained benefits. Placebo alone produced significant reductions (~3 days from baseline; p<0.05). AM use decreased more with treatment (p<0.05). Responder rates were higher with treatment (36.8% vs 21.3%), and MIDAS improved more (18 vs 9 points), though differences were not statistically significant. Safety profiles were comparable. Conclusions Active treatment significantly reduced migraine frequency and AM use, while MIDAS and responder rates showed no significant difference. Placebo yielded clinically meaningful improvements, highlighting its critical role in trial design. Future studies should include placebo arms and closely match procedures to interventions. Conflict of interest Pernelle Guastavino ; nothing to disclose. Michelle Barry; nothing to disclose. Mahmood Mirza; nothing to disclose. Patrick Brouwer; nothing to disclose

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1097 PREVENTIVE INTERVENTION VS PLACEBO IN CHRONIC MIGRAINE: A META ANALYSIS
Date Crossref
01/05/2026
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Migraine and Headache StudiesPain Management and Placebo EffectTraumatic Brain Injury Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.