Prevalence and epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis D in Uzbekistan—results from a population-based serosurvey, 2022
Résumé fourni par la source
Objectives Uzbekistan, historically a country with high hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection endemicity, introduced infant hepatitis B vaccination in 2001 and has sustained ≥90% coverage for hepatitis B vaccine birth dose (HepB-BD) and three or more doses. In 2017, Uzbekistan initiated hepatitis B elimination activities. However, data on hepatitis B prevalence in the general population were lacking. Methods In 2022, we conducted a serosurvey among persons aged ≥5 years using stratified cluster sampling. Blood samples were tested for markers of HBV and hepatitis D virus (HDV) infections. Results We enrolled 9063 adults aged ≥18 years and 4092 children aged 5-17 years. Overall weighted prevalence of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) was 4.1% (95% confidence interval, 3.1-5.0%); 13.0% (7.8-20.8%) of HBsAg-positive persons had detectable HDV ribonucleic acid (RNA). HBsAg prevalence was lowest (0.4%) among 5-14-year-olds and highest (7.3%) among 40-49-year-olds. Children who had not received HepB-BD had higher HBsAg prevalence (2.3%) than those who had received HepB-BD (0.1%, P < 0.001). Conclusion Successful hepatitis B vaccination resulted in low HBV infection prevalence among children, but hepatitis B remains widespread among adults in Uzbekistan. Expanding HBV prevention, screening, and treatment among adults, and maintaining high infant vaccination coverage may help achieve hepatitis B elimination in Uzbekistan.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevalence and epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis D in Uzbekistan—results from a population-based serosurvey, 2022
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.