Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

An examination of secondary-level technology subject learning outcomes in Ireland

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Secondary-level education in Ireland has recently completed one of the largest curricular reforms in the history of the state, resulting in the development of the Junior Cycle Framework for students typically aged 12-15. As part of this process, secondary-level technology subjects have undergone a major revision, shifting their positioning relative to each other and broader STEM initiatives. This paper employs a qualitative and quantitative content analysis approach to examine the learning outcomes specified for Applied Technology, Engineering, Graphics, and Wood Technology. Utilising the three-part Heuristic Framework for Technology Education, the learning outcomes of each subject were deductively and independently coded into categories of Technical Skills, Technological Scientific Knowledge, and Socio-ethical Technical Understanding. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus, and the frequency and distribution of these categories were calculated to support qualitative inference. The results reveal a predominant and distinct focus on Technical Skills across all four subjects, suggesting a curriculum heavily influenced by its vocational origins. Engineering and Graphics demonstrated the most significant skew; Engineering contained 23 Technical Skill outcomes out of 36, while Graphics was found to have no learning outcomes related to Socio-ethical Technical Understanding. While Applied Technology and Wood Technology demonstrated the highest proportional representation of Socio-ethical Technical Understanding, a considerable system-wide imbalance persists. These findings highlight a misalignment between stated subject aims and defined learning outcomes, informing critical recommendations for the ongoing reform of Senior Cycle technology subjects and future curriculum development.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
An examination of secondary-level technology subject learning outcomes in Ireland
Date Crossref
04/05/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Education and Technology IntegrationMathematics Education and ProgramsEducational Theory and Curriculum Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.