Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

Impact of Acute Pancreatitis Aetiology on Long-Term Outcomes Following a First Episode of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Afrique du Sud. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is increasingly recognised as a disease with clinically significant long-term consequences. However, the extent to which aetiology influences the spectrum of long-term pancreatic sequelae remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated long-term complications following a first episode of AP, with a protocol-defined focus on the impact of aetiology. Methods: This review evaluated eligible studies that included adults with a first episode of AP who were followed for chronic pancreatitis (CP), exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), or new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was conducted from January 2002 to June 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled incidence proportions. A prespecified network meta-analysis was not feasible because outcome-specific event counts stratified by aetiology were inconsistently reported. This study satisfied PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251074032). Results: Eight studies met eligibility criteria with extractable data for quantitative synthesis. Five studies (n ≈ 10,780) reported chronic pancreatitis (CP), with a pooled incidence of approximately 7–8% following a first episode of acute pancreatitis (AP) and substantial heterogeneity (I2 ≈ 96%). Three studies (n = 796) reported exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), with a pooled incidence of approximately 23%, although estimates were highly heterogeneous (I2 ≈ 98%). Four studies (n = 2706; 415 events) reported new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), with a pooled incidence of approximately 20% (I2 ≈ 93%). Although aetiology-specific quantitative comparisons were not possible, narrative synthesis consistently demonstrated higher long-term risk following alcohol-associated AP, lower risk after biliary AP, and intermediate but variable outcomes in idiopathic AP. Conclusions: Clinically meaningful long-term pancreatic dysfunction is common after a first episode of acute pancreatitis, particularly new-onset diabetes mellitus. While aetiology-specific risks could not be quantified, consistent patterns suggest that aetiology shapes long-term outcomes. These findings support structured, aetiology-informed follow-up after acute pancreatitis and the need for standardised outcome reporting in future studies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Impact of Acute Pancreatitis Aetiology on Long-Term Outcomes Following a First Episode of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Date Crossref
29/04/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Pancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesDermatological and COVID-19 studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.