Impacts of a Rural Hospital Global Budget Alternative Payment Model on Patterns of Cancer Surgery
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Rural patients often experience barriers accessing high-quality surgical care. The Pennsylvania Rural Health Model (PARHM) aimed to improve rural health through all-payer hospital global budgets and transformation plans, which may influence hospitals' incentives and capacity to provide various surgical services, including cancer surgery. OBJECTIVES: Examine the association between PARHM and patterns of cancer surgery overall, by timing of entry into PARHM, and by cancer type. RESEARCH DESIGN: Stacked difference-in-differences (DID) models including hospital service area (HSA)-level propensity score weights, comparing patients living in HSAs with hospitals participating in PARHM to those in HSAs with eligible nonparticipating hospitals. SUBJECTS: Patients in eligible HSAs who had surgery between 2016 and 2023 for one of 11 cancers with evidence of surgical volume-outcome relationships. MEASURES: Surgery at a high-volume, Commission on Cancer (CoC) accredited, or National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated hospital, and travel distance to the surgical hospital. RESULTS: The sample included 22,728 cancer surgeries for patients across 60 HSAs. Pooled estimates indicate no statistically significant differential changes in outcomes. In HSAs served by the 2019 cohort of PARHM hospitals (smaller and more remote facilities), PARHM was associated with a differential increase in surgery at CoC hospitals (DID estimate: 8.7 percentage points, 95% CI: 1.5- 16.0). We observed differential increases in surgery at CoC hospitals for colon and rectal cancers, and decreases in surgery at CoC and high-volume hospitals for liver cancer and at NCI centers for bladder cancer. CONCLUSION: PARHM had limited overall effects on surgical cancer care, with some variation across hospitals and cancer types.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impacts of a Rural Hospital Global Budget Alternative Payment Model on Patterns of Cancer Surgery
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.