Communication-related aspects drive senior patients’ satisfaction with the process of decision-making in cancer therapy
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Treatment decisions in cancer care can be life-critical and significantly affect self-determination concerns. Therefore, it is of great importance that the decision-making process is set up in the interest and satisfaction of the cancer patient. In a survey of 2,011 patients aged ≥ 50 years with breast cancer or colorectal cancer, 72.1% reported high satisfaction with the treatment decision-making process. Multivariate logistic regression identified several independent predictors of higher satisfaction: receiving comprehensive information about the illness and therapy options (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.37, 95% CI 3.89-8.52), strong personal involvement in decision-making (aOR 2.93, 95% CI 2.15-3.98), perceived concordance among treating physicians (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.49-2.71), higher self-efficacy (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.31-2.04), and greater social support (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.10-1.67). Conversely, frailty was associated with lower satisfaction (aOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.90). These findings suggest that patient satisfaction with decision-making may be enhanced when physicians provide thorough information, actively involve patients in decisions, and coordinate care consistently, while frail patients and those with low self-efficacy or limited social networks may benefit from targeted support.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Communication-related aspects drive senior patients’ satisfaction with the process of decision-making in cancer therapy
- Date Crossref
- 30/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.