Pembrolizumab trough concentration monitoring and association with outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Rattachement africain : gr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains limited due to drug-related challenges; however, a better understanding of exposure-effect relationships may improve antitumor activity and reduce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). METHODS: We conducted a prospective TDM study measuring pembrolizumab trough concentrations (Cmin) using a commercial ELISA kit in 31 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy. Serial Cmin measurements were obtained at baseline (T0), before cycle 2 (T1), and at 3 (T2), 6 (T3), and 12 months (T4). Baseline clinicopathologic and serologic variables were recorded. Patients were followed for 2 years to assess treatment outcomes. RESULTS: = 0.25). Higher Cmin levels at later timepoints were associated with improved clinical outcomes. Elevated Cmin correlated with a greater number of organ systems affected by irAEs. High baseline albumin and fewer comorbidities were predictors of higher Cmin. CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab TDM is a feasible approach in NSCLC. Higher late-treatment Cmin levels may be associated with favorable outcomes, supporting pembrolizumab exposure as a potential biomarker and highlighting TDM as a tool for dose-tailoring strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pembrolizumab trough concentration monitoring and association with outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
- Date Crossref
- 05/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.