Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Clinical Supervision and Positive Practice Environments: A Scoping Review

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : pt. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: The purpose of clinical supervision (CS) is to assist healthcare providers in performing effective professional activities and providing the best care for patients, which has been described as associated with improved performance and quality indicators. Additionally, CS was found to be beneficial for the mental health of healthcare professionals in terms of their job satisfaction, levels of stress, and burnout. Objective: The aim of the study was to map and synthesize existing evidence on how CS has been associated with positive practice environments for healthcare teams. Methods: Scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Searches were conducted in July 2024 using CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science. Both primary research and review studies were considered, as well as relevant gray literature. Studies were included if they addressed CS in relation to positive practice environments, well-being, or work conditions among healthcare teams. Data were analyzed thematically and through content analysis. Results: This review included 37 studies, highlighting eight key categories: (i) mental health promotion; (ii) organizational culture; (iii) supervisor qualities; (iv) performance; (v) professional development; (vi) leadership/management; (vii) job satisfaction; and (viii) communication. Conclusion: The findings indicate that CS is frequently described in the literature in relation to professional competencies, workplace well-being, psychological safety, job satisfaction, and communication within healthcare teams.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Clinical Supervision and Positive Practice Environments: A Scoping Review
Date Crossref
28/04/2026
Éditeur
S. Karger AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Nursing education and managementHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutCounseling Practices and Supervision

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.