Operational Anomaly Screening in Permanent Basic Farmland Using Optimized Remote Sensing Semantic Segmentation: Implications for Sustainable Land Stewardship

Le résumé fourni par la source

Cropland protection enforcement is central to food security and sustainable land management, yet small-scale encroachments within Permanent Basic Farmland (PBF) boundaries frequently evade conventional field surveys and reactive inspection regimes. Existing remote sensing approaches rely mainly on comprehensive land-cover classification or bi-temporal change detection, which often generate alerts beyond the regulatory scope and require annotation efforts that limit county-scale deployment. To address this gap, this study reframes PBF monitoring as a boundary-constrained anomaly screening task, defined as the detection of surface conditions that deviate from expected cultivation norms within legally defined parcels. To operationalise this task, we adapt a DeepLabv3+-based segmentation pipeline by incorporating an auxiliary edge branch and a composite loss to improve sensitivity to minority-class anomalies and preserve fragmented parcel boundaries. The model is trained on the LoveDA dataset and evaluated in Mancheng District, Hebei Province, China, without site-specific fine-tuning. Multi-temporal imagery from 2021 to 2023 is further used as a post hoc consistency check to distinguish persistent anomalies from transient surface conditions, rather than to model temporal dynamics explicitly. Cross-regional zero-shot evaluation further examines model robustness under heterogeneous environmental conditions. Benchmarked against five comparison architectures, the adapted pipeline achieves a Recall of 61.25%, representing a 10.24 percentage-point improvement over DeepLabv3+ and expanding the set of candidate encroachments for field verification. This result should be interpreted in terms of screening sensitivity rather than overall segmentation optimisation. The outputs are intended as preliminary screening leads that support, rather than replace, expert review. The principal contribution of this study therefore lies in reframing PBF monitoring as an operational anomaly-screening task aligned with enforcement needs, rather than in proposing a fundamentally new segmentation architecture.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.