Recurrence and Malignant Transformation After Borderline Ovarian Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Rattachement africain : gb, cy, mt. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND/AIM: Borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) frequently affect women of reproductive age. Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is commonly offered, but recurrence risk varies by surgical approach and histological subtype, while malignant transformation remains incompletely defined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify recurrence and malignant transformation risks following different surgical strategies for BOTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: . Methodological quality was evaluated using MINORS. RESULTS: =26.42%). In serous BOTs, recurrence after cystectomy was 0.29 (0.23-0.56) and after USO 0.15 (0.09-0.24). In mucinous BOTs, corresponding estimates were 0.26 (0.14-0.38) and 0.08 (0.02-0.13). Overall malignant transformation occurred in 1% of women (0.01; 0.01-0.02) but increased substantially following recurrence (0.22). CONCLUSION: Cystectomy-based FSS is associated with significantly higher recurrence than oophorectomy-based approaches or radical surgery. Although malignant transformation is rare overall, its marked increase following recurrence highlights the need for histology-informed counselling and long-term, risk-adapted surveillance.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Recurrence and Malignant Transformation After Borderline Ovarian Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 28/04/2026
- Éditeur
- International Institute of Anticancer Research
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.