Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Utility, validity, feasibility and acceptability of a clinician-administered depression, two-question screening tool for routine multiple sclerosis clinic administration

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Depression is prevalent among individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) yet frequently goes undetected and untreated. Time constraints are a barrier to depression screening in MS clinics. We evaluated the clinical utility, diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of the Two-Question Screening tool (2QS) for routine, in-clinic depression screening. Objectives: A prospective cross-sectional study of 207 consecutively recruited adults with MS (M age = 47.3 ± 12.7, 77.3% female) was conducted at a metropolitan MS Clinic. Clinicians administered the 2QS during in-clinic or telehealth consultations. To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the 2QS in identifying depression, participants underwent a Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders – Fifth Edition (SCID-5) for major depressive disorder (MDD), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). Internal consistency, convergent validity and clinician feasibility were assessed. Results: The 2QS had 100% (95% CI: 71%–100%) sensitivity and 68% (95% CI: 60%–76%) specificity for detecting MDD. Clinician screening adherence was 76%. For the in-clinic subsample, clinician-administered 2QS correlations were SCID-5 MDD, r = 0.39 ( r = 0.60 with subthreshold depression symptoms added); PHQ-9, r = 0.73; and DASS-D, r = 0.74. Conclusions: Clinician-administered 2QS is valid and feasible for routine depression screening at MS clinic appointments. With high sensitivity and acceptable specificity, the clinician-administered 2QS is suitable to improve depression detection in people with MS.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Les sujets associés

Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and Access

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.