Distinct challenges faced by surgeons in conducting and publishing surgical research: implications for training, ethics, and academic surgery

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Surgical research is beset by a distinct set of challenges that differ meaningfully from those encountered in other medical disciplines. Despite surgeons' historic contributions to medical advancement, the proportion of surgeon-authored publications has declined relative to total medical literature output over the latter half of the twentieth century. This narrative review aims to comprehensively identify, categorise, and discuss the specific barriers surgeons face in conducting and publishing surgical research, with implications for surgical training, research ethics, and academic surgery. METHODS: A narrative review was conducted through a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Search terms included combinations of "surgical research," "ethical considerations," "patient confidentiality," "publication barriers," "surgical methodology," and "academic surgery." No restriction was placed on year of publication. Only English-language, peer-reviewed articles were considered. Four authors independently screened retrieved records by title and abstract, and reference lists of included studies were hand-searched for additional relevant publications. Priority was given to narrative reviews, original research articles, and discussion papers addressing the identified themes. RESULTS: The challenges identified fell into two broad domains. In the conduct of surgical research, major barriers include extreme time constraints arising from the structural demands of surgical practice, ethical complexities inherent to the surgeon's dual role as caregiver and investigator, surgeon- and technique-specific variability that complicates standardization and reproducibility, and patient-related obstacles including reluctance to enrol in trials and difficulty maintaining long-term follow-up. In the publication of surgical research, key barriers include communicating technically complex procedures to a broad readership, a worsening peer review crisis driven by reviewer scarcity and burnout within a relatively small surgical community, ethical deficiencies in reporting, including inadequate documentation of ethical approval and informed consent, and challenges in producing and ethically managing high-quality visual and multimedia content. CONCLUSION: Surgeons face a multilayered set of structural, ethical, and methodological barriers throughout the research and publication process. Addressing these challenges will require targeted interventions at the levels of surgical training, institutional support, and journal infrastructure. Greater awareness of these barriers is an essential first step toward strengthening the evidence base that underpins surgical practice.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.