Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Modelling the Cost-Effectiveness of a Placental Malaria Vaccine in Sub-Saharan Africa

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Placental malaria increases the risk of adverse birth outcomes. Current preventive measures are undermined by poor coverage, growing resistance to chemo-preventive and therapeutic drugs, and vector eliminating insecticides. Candidate placental malaria (PM) vaccines (PAMVAC and PRIMVAC) have shown safety and immunogenicity in Phase I trials, but empirical evidence on their potential population-level value is lacking. This study modelled the expected cost-effectiveness of a PM vaccine administered before pregnancy. Methods: A decision-analytic model compared two strategies from the provider’s perspective: vaccinating women of childbearing age versus no vaccination. The model incorporated gravidity-specific risks of PM, neonatal mortality and the malaria attributable fractions from the literature. Since the efficacy of a PM vaccine for malaria prevention is unknown, we assumed a 40% efficacy and varied this estimate widely in sensitivity analyses. Primary outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per perinatal disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted. Baseline, best-case, and worst-case scenarios were analysed. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to assess parameter uncertainty. Cost-effectiveness was defined as an ICER below half of sub- Saharan Africa’s 2025 GDP per capita ($1556). Results: The vaccine was most cost-effective among primigravidae. Under baseline assumptions (40% efficacy; 30% uptake; $5 dose price), the ICER was $321 per perinatal DALY averted for primigravidae versus $4444 for multigravidae. Best-case assumptions further improved cost-effectiveness ($225 vs. $3148). Sensitivity analyses showed robust cost-effectiveness for primigravidae across all plausible parameter ranges, while ICERs in multigravidae were highly sensitive to programme costs and vaccine efficacy. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves demonstrated that vaccination becomes favourable for primigravidae at relatively low willingness-to-pay thresholds. Conclusions: A placental malaria vaccine delivered before pregnancy has high potential to be cost-effective in endemic areas when targeted to protect primigravidae. These findings support prioritised deployment strategies and highlight the value of early economic modelling to inform vaccine development and policy planning.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Modelling the Cost-Effectiveness of a Placental Malaria Vaccine in Sub-Saharan Africa
Date Crossref
23/04/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Malaria Research and ControlParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.