External validation and improvement of an algorithm that identifies multiple sclerosis relapses in the French national healthcare claims database

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a frequent neurological condition affecting young adults with acute disabling neurological episodes (relapses). MS relapses are not recorded in claims databases despite their importance for (pharmaco)epidemiological studies. This study aimed to validate and improve an algorithm identifying relapses in relapsing-remitting MS initiating disease-modifying therapy (DMT) within the French nationwide claims database (SNDS). METHODS: Clinical data from the French MS registry (OFSEP) linked to the SNDS were used. The cohort included MS patients with a first DMT claim between July 2015 and December 2017, naive to any MS treatment, followed until December 2018 (n=1,640). The initial relapse algorithm combined high-dose corticosteroid prescriptions and hospitalization duration. Incidence of the first relapse identified in the SNDS was compared with OFSEP confirmed relapses that have been treated by corticosteroid or hospitalized (gold standard). Performances were estimated using Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV. Algorithm were reevaluated after revision of its criteria based on experts' review of false positive and negative cases' claims, and finally after adding non-naive MS patients (n=9,966). RESULTS: The performances of the initial algorithm were Specificity 85.2%, Sensitivity 74.0%, NPV 89.8%, PPV 65.3%. After revision of corticosteroid dosages and hospitalization durations thresholds, performance slightly improved: 85.0%, 75.4%, 90.2%, 65.3%, respectively. When considering naive and non-naive MS patients, Sensitivity and NPV stayed similar (75.1% and 91.6%) while Specificity and PPV decreased (81.8% and 55.4%). CONCLUSION: The final algorithm of treated/hospitalized relapses can be applied accurately in naïve MS patients initiating a DMT, in the SNDS and likely in other claims databases after adapting to each country's reimbursement and care practices.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.