Anatomical Study of the Lateral Cutaneous Branch of the Intercostal Nerves in the Intramuscular Portion
Résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: The lateral cutaneous branch (LCB) of the intercostal nerves (ICNs) is classically described as a sensory nerve supplying the lateral thoracic wall. However, it may also contribute to the innervation of the intercostal muscles and the digitations of the serratus anterior. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the course, variations, and divisions of the LCB along its path within the intercostal space. METHODS: This anatomical study was conducted between January and April 2024 on 11 formalin-fixed adult cadavers. The third to sixth ICNs were dissected. The origin of the LCB relative to the midaxillary line, its length before division, and the number and destination of its branches (muscular or cutaneous) were recorded. RESULTS: Five females (45%) and six males (55%) were included (age range: 66-103 years). A total of 75 LCBs were identified and dissected. The mean distance from the midaxillary line was 3.72 cm ± 2.43 cm, and the mean length before division was 3.71 cm ± 1.84 cm. The LCB was divided into two branches in 56 cases (75%) and into three branches in 19 cases (25%). One branch consistently demonstrated a cutaneous distribution, while one or two branches exhibited a motor distribution. CONCLUSION: Within its intramuscular course, the LCB provides motor branches to the intercostal muscles and the digitations of the serratus anterior before becoming purely sensory.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Anatomical Study of the Lateral Cutaneous Branch of the Intercostal Nerves in the Intramuscular Portion
- Date Crossref
- 24/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.