Multi-sensor decision tree machine learning algorithm for identifying mangrove ecosystem
Résumé fourni par la source
This paper compares the reliability of multi-spatial-resolution PlanetScope imagery in Tapanuli Tengah, Sentinel-2A imagery in Asahan Regency, and Landsat-8 imagery in Asahan Regency for detecting mangroves and their vegetation density using a decision tree machine learning (DT-ML) approach. Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2A were used to identify mangrove and non-mangrove classes, while high-resolution PlanetScope was specifically examined to detect mangrove density, i.e., dense, medium, and sparse. This study demonstrates that DT-ML achieves overall accuracies of 92.4% (Landsat 8), 93.0% (Sentinel-2A), 92.1% (PlanetScope Tapanuli Tengah Site), and 94.5% (PlanetScope Langkat Site). NDVI and substrate were found to be the most influential variables across all datasets, particularly in distinguishing mangrove from non-mangrove ecosystems, thereby reducing misclassification of non-mangrove classes. PlanetScope's high spatial resolution (3 m) delivers superior detail, enabling more accurate detection of canopy density. The Sentinel-2A Red Edge channel is crucial for distinguishing mangroves from other vegetation types. The Decision Tree algorithm has been successfully adapted to multi-resolution imagery, yielding a model with good interpretability and straightforward generalization. It is concluded that Decision Tree Machine Learning may provide higher accuracy and the ability to integrate spectral variables from satellite imagery with non-spectral socio-geo-biophysical variables.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Multi-sensor decision tree machine learning algorithm for identifying mangrove ecosystem
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- EDP Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.