Mitigating Spurious Invariance in Contrastive Learning: A Probabilistic Self-Supervised Learning Framework for Medical Image Analysis
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Owing to the prohibitive cost of manual annotation for enormous medical images, self-supervised learning (SSL) has gained substantial attention and shown promise in various medical imaging tasks. Among SSL approaches, contrastive learning has emerged as a prominent one, encouraging models to encode semantic information that remains invariant between different augmented views. However, this invariance can be spurious for medical images, as subtle but critical medical features can be suppressed during augmentations. In this paper, we mitigate this issue by encoding the learned feature embeddings as probability distributions rather than fixed vectors, thus capturing a richer and more nuanced spectrum of information. Furthermore, we propose a unified probabilistic framework that seamlessly integrates multiple SSL approaches. Our method achieves superior performance over the state-of-the-art SSL methods on various downstream tasks across multiple datasets, including medical image segmentation and classification. We further validate the method through additional analyses of robustness to stronger augmentations, label efficiency under limited fine-tuning labels, and computational trade-offs. The code will be released upon the acceptance of the manuscript at https://github.com/wwzjer/ProbSSL.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mitigating Spurious Invariance in Contrastive Learning: A Probabilistic Self-Supervised Learning Framework for Medical Image Analysis
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2026
- Éditeur
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.