Scalable biomarkers of Parkinson’s disease: insights from mobile EEG in Peru
Rattachement africain : us, pe. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Mobile electroencephalography (EEG) may offer a scalable, cost-effective way to capture neural signatures of Parkinson’s disease (PD) in low-resource settings. In a cross-sectional cohort of 44 individuals with PD in Lima, Peru evaluated “off-medication”, we recorded EEG data using a 32-channel wireless system Emotiv Flex2 saline EEG with integrated gyroscope and collected standard clinical measures including motor (UPDRS-III) and cognitive (MoCA) evaluations. We quantified relative band power and tested associations with clinical outcomes using partial Spearman correlations. Reduced left frontal low beta (18–22 Hz) power correlated with worse motor severity (ρ = −0.539, P < 0.001) and lower cognitive performance (MoCA ρ = 0.430, P = 0.005), including a MoCA sub-score emphasizing attention/executive function (ρ = 0.650, P < 0.001). Decreased left parietal gamma (30–40 Hz) power also correlated with UPDRS-III (ρ = −0.618, P < 0.0001). We also explored the possibility to assess fall risk using this device. Linear discriminant analysis with leave-one-out cross-validation achieved 97% accuracy (AUC = 0.95) using combined EEG-gyroscope features versus 78% with only EEG features and 72% with only gyroscope features. These results suggest mobile EEG may identify clinically meaningful PD biomarkers and, when paired with inertial features, may support fall-risk assessment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Scalable biomarkers of Parkinson’s disease: insights from mobile EEG in Peru
- Date Crossref
- 22/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.