Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 preprint

Effect of NHS surgical hubs on elective hip-and-knee replacement volume, length of stay and waiting times: national longitudinal difference-in-differences study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Elective surgical hubs have been introduced across England to increase surgical capacity, improve productivity and reduce waiting times. Evidence on their effects remains limited, particularly beyond the early period of implementation. We evaluated the effect of surgical hubs on surgical volume, patient waiting times and length of hospital stay for elective hip and knee replacements in the English NHS. Methods We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study using Hospital Episode Statistics for NHS acute trusts in England from April 2014 to September 2024. The analysis included 76 trusts, of which 29 opened a surgical hub providing trauma and orthopaedic surgery during the study period and 47 did not. Outcomes were measured quarterly at trust level and comprised the number of elective hip and knee replacements, mean length of stay and mean waiting time from addition to the waiting list to admission. We used a difference-in-differences approach for staggered hub opening, with trust and quarter fixed effects and standard errors clustered at trust level. Results Surgical hub opening was associated with an increase of 43.75 hip and knee replacement procedures per quarter (95% CI 22.22 to 65.28), equivalent to a 19.1% increase relative to the pre-hub mean. Mean length of stay was 0.32 days lower following hub opening (95% CI −0.48 to −0.16), equivalent to a 7.8% reduction. There was no statistically significant overall change in mean waiting time (−14.96 days, 95% CI −33.11 to 3.19). Conclusions Surgical hub opening was associated with increased volumes of hip and knee replacement surgery and shorter hospital stays. We found no statistically significant overall reduction in waiting times. The findings suggest that surgical hubs can increase elective surgical activity, although additional capacity may not translate directly into shorter waiting times. Trial registration Not applicable.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Effect of NHS surgical hubs on elective hip-and-knee replacement volume, length of stay and waiting times: national longitudinal difference-in-differences study
Date Crossref
22/04/2026
Éditeur
openRxiv
Type
posted-content

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University of York Centre for Health Economics pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Health Policy pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University of Birmingham Centre for Evidence and Implementation Science pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Hull York Medical School pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Centre for Health Economics — University of York, Department of Health Policy — London School of Economics and Political Science et Centre for Evidence and Implementation Science — University of Birmingham, avec 1 autre affiliation.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Total Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationSurgical site infection prevention

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.