Evaluation of Serum Antibodies as Correlates of Protection Against Norovirus Infection and Disease
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Norovirus is a major cause of acute gastroenteritis. Several vaccines are in development. Identifying a reliable immunological correlate of protection (CoP) would aid vaccine development and evaluation; however, no strong CoP has been established to date. METHODS: We evaluated the relationships between prechallenge genogroup I, genotype 1 (GI.1) and GII.4 norovirus antibodies and clinical outcomes in two human vaccine-challenge studies. We analyzed genotype-specific histo-blood group antigen blocking titers, serum IgA and IgG, and total antibody ELISA. We used Bayesian regression models to assess relationships between antibody levels and protection against infection, illness, and disease severity. RESULTS: Associations between antibody titers and protection were generally weak, and varied by genotype and vaccination status. GI.1 antibodies showed the strongest relationships, particularly among vaccinated participants, whereas naturally acquired GI.1 antibodies in unvaccinated individuals were weakly or not associated with protection. In contrast, GII.4 antibodies exhibited weak and inconsistent relationships among vaccinated participants, while unvaccinated participants showed only modest and more stable positive associations. CONCLUSIONS: Currently measured serum antibodies do not provide reliable and robust estimates of protection against norovirus clinical outcomes in all settings. Immune markers beyond serum antibody titers should be evaluated to identify more robust correlates of protection for norovirus.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluation of Serum Antibodies as Correlates of Protection Against Norovirus Infection and Disease
- Date Crossref
- 20/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.