Candidate Genomic Features Associated with Persistence in Enterococcus spp.
Rattachement africain : pt, Afrique du Sud. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Bacterial persistence has been extensively studied as a possible explanation for strain survival under stress; however, in Enterococcus spp., this ability is still an understudied phenomenon. In this study, 40 Enterococcus spp. isolates of human clinical (n = 10), veterinary commensal (n = 10), veterinary clinical (n = 10) and veterinary environmental (hospital surfaces) (n = 10) origins, were exposed to a high concentration of ciprofloxacin. Time–kill curves were established, after which antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were reassessed. Subsequently, the only presumptive persister was selected for Whole-Genome Sequencing, together with one isolate showing no evidence of persister formation. Comparative genomic analyses were conducted to identify genetic variations between exposed and non-exposed isolates and to explore potential genetic determinants associated with persistence. Observed genetic features present in the persister isolate included toxin–antitoxin systems, a cold-shock protein and the tyrosine-type recombinase/integrase XerC, which may represent putative candidates for further investigation. Interestingly, the majority of toxin–antitoxin system-associated genes were found in plasmids. This study represents an important step towards a better understanding of persistence development in Enterococcus spp.; however, validation using other methodologies such as RNA-sequencing is an important next step.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Candidate Genomic Features Associated with Persistence in Enterococcus spp.
- Date Crossref
- 19/04/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.