DockM8_v1.1_Lit-PCBA_benchmarking_data_part1
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
DockM8 — Lit-PCBA benchmark data, part 1 of 3 (corrected, v1.1.1)================================================================ This record contains benchmarking data for the Lit-PCBA datasetproduced with DockM8 v1.1.1. It is intended for benchmarkingscoring functions and machine-learning models, and as a largearchive of pre-docked poses generated by multiple dockingalgorithms. This is the CORRECTED release: RTMScore and GenScore were recomputedagainst a corrected whole-residue binding pocket, and the per-posescoring tables, the per-scoring-function selected poses, and theconsensus/performance results were regenerated to match. All otherscoring functions and the docking poses themselves are unchangedfrom the original run. Lit-PCBA is split across THREE downloads because of its size. Thisis part 1 of 3. Part 1 (this record): adrb2 aldh1 esr1a esr1t fen1 Part 2: idh1 kat2a mapk1 Part 3: gba mtorc1 pkm2 pparg tp53 vdr Coverage (all parts): 14 targets, docked with 3 programs(gnina, plants, smina). Note: the target oprk1 is not included. Single download: lit-pcba_1.tar.bz2 Archive layout (nested compression)----------------------------------- The files are NOT directly browsable — the download is a compressedarchive of compressed archives of gzipped SDFs. Use the`extract_zenodo.py` helper from the DockM8 repository to unpack them. lit-pcba_1.tar.bz2 # outer archive (this download)└── phase2/ └── [target].tar.bz2 # one inner archive per target └── [target]/ ├── [target]_activity_data.csv # experimental active/decoy labels ├── [target]_docking_library.sdf.gz # compounds docked ├── [target]_ligand.sdf.gz # reference ligand(s) ├── [target]_pocket.pdb / .pdbqt # docking box (unchanged) ├── [target]_protein.pdb # original structure ├── [target]_protein_prepared.pdb # prepared for docking ├── [target]_corrected_10A_pocket.pdb # corrected whole-residue pocket [v1.1.1] ├── [target]_corrected_10A_pocket.pdb.json # pocket fingerprint [v1.1.1] └── results/ ├── [target]_prepared_library.sdf.gz ├── corrected_inputs/ # controlled activity universe per program [v1.1.1] │ └── [target]_[program]_{activity_data,universe_activity,excluded}.csv ├── [program]/ # per docking engine (gnina, plants, smina) │ ├── [program]_poses.sdf.gz # raw docked poses │ ├── [program]_poses_rescored.sdf.gz # poses + scores (RTM/Gen corrected) │ ├── [program]_poses_rescored.csv # same, as a table │ └── [program]_poses_corrected_rtm_genscore.csv # corrected RTM/Gen per pose [v1.1.1] ├── scores/ │ └── [target]_[program]_[SF]_scores.csv # best-pose score per SF ├── performance/ │ └── [target]_[program]_[SF]_performance.csv # consensus enrichment per SF └── clustering/ └── [target]_[program]_[SF]_selected_poses.sdf.gz # selected pose per compound per SF [SF] runs over each scoring function and its consensus combinations.The four corrected scoring functions are RTMScore, GenScore-scoring,GenScore-docking and GenScore-balanced. How to extract-------------- Clone the DockM8 repo (main branch) and run the helper script — itreverses all three compression layers in one command: git clone https://github.com/DrugBud-Suite/DockM8.git cd DockM8 # Put the downloaded archive(s) in a folder, then: python -m analysis.extract_zenodo /path/to/downloads /path/to/output \ --archives lit-pcba_1.tar.bz2 To reassemble the full Lit-PCBA benchmark, download all three partsinto the same folder and extract them together: python -m analysis.extract_zenodo /path/to/downloads /path/to/output \ --archives lit-pcba_1.tar.bz2,lit-pcba_2.tar.bz2,lit-pcba_3.tar.bz2 The script will: 1. Extract the outer .tar.bz2, 2. Extract each per-target inner .tar.bz2, 3. Decompress every *.sdf.gz in place. Output layout: /path/to/output/lit-pcba/PART_1/ IMPORTANT: Do NOT attempt manual extraction with `tar -xjf` alone —you will be left with nested tarballs and thousands of unreadable.sdf.gz files. Always use the helper script.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.