The Evolving Roles of Electrical Geophysical Methods for In Situ Remediation Assessment: Progress and Perspectives
Rattachement africain : cn, us, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract In situ remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater demands real‐time monitoring to capture complex subsurface dynamics. Geophysical methods, particularly electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and induced polarization (IP), offer non‐ or minimally invasive, high‐resolution imaging of subsurface changes during remediation. This is the first review to synthesize advances in geophysical monitoring of four key technologies: in situ chemical oxidation/reduction (ISCO/ISCR), in situ bioremediation (ISB), in situ thermal remediation (ISTR), and permeable reactive barriers (PRB). We systematically examine how variations in hydrogeology, temperature, hydrochemistry and contaminant indicators influence electrical responses, and discuss the principles, advantages, and limitations of ERT/IP for each technology. Based on a bibliometric analysis of over 200 studies, we identify current trends, critical challenges, and future research directions. Integrating geophysical methods with direct sampling is essential to transform electrical signatures into actionable insights for remediation management. Continued progress will be made via advances in petrophysical relationships, multi‐source data fusion coupled inversion frameworks, and the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to enable real‐time, adaptive remediation strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Evolving Roles of Electrical Geophysical Methods for In Situ Remediation Assessment: Progress and Perspectives
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.