How is integrated reporting quality influential on ESG risk scores? Pillar-Based evidence from international banks
Rattachement africain : tr, az, cy, kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The reporting quality and environment, social, and governance (ESG) scores have become critical in investment and trading decisions. Accordingly, this study finds out the association between Integrated Reporting Quality (IRQ), its pillars, and ESG risk (ESGR) scores of 33 international banks, having Sustainalytics’ ESGR scores and publishing integrated reports between 2020 and 2023. IRQ scores are calculated by considering “Fundamental Concepts”, “Guiding Principles”, and “Content Elements” pillars of IR framework. The findings show that IRQ and its pillars are associated with lower ESGR scores. Also, the robustness of the results is confirmed through green bond issuance and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. Therefore, the critical contribution of this study is to empirically reveal the role of IRQ in each pillar and to relate them to ESGR. It introduces a multi-pillar scoring approach that provides a replicable framework for assessing IRQ and ESGR scores. By focusing on ESGR, this study suggests a risk-based perspective on IR and presents how reporting quality functions as a governance mechanism for mitigating sustainability-related risks. The results enable a better theoretical understanding of IR as both a risk mitigation and stakeholder communication mechanism and provides insights for regulators, investors, and institutions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- How is integrated reporting quality influential on ESG risk scores? Pillar-Based evidence from international banks
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.