Effect of Incretin-Based and Nonpharmacologic Weight Loss on Body Composition

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Incretin-based therapies induce substantial weight loss and are widely prescribed; disproportionate losses in fat-free mass (FFM) and skeletal muscle are a concern. PURPOSE: To evaluate body composition changes associated with incretin therapies in adults with obesity. DATA SOURCES: Scopus, Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine), CINAHL, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2003 to February 2026. STUDY SELECTION: English-language randomized controlled trials reporting body composition outcomes of liraglutide, semaglutide, tirzepatide, or dulaglutide therapy in adults (aged ≥18 years). DATA EXTRACTION: Primary outcomes included changes in fat mass, FFM, lean soft tissue (LST), muscle-related indices, and visceral adiposity measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Prespecified benchmarks were applied to contextualize expected muscle-related losses (about 25% of total weight loss for FFM or LST derived from BIA or DXA, and about 15% for skeletal muscle measured by CT or MRI). DATA SYNTHESIS: . Weight loss was consistently larger in the incretin intervention groups than in placebo or lifestyle intervention comparators and was consistently accompanied by reductions in total fat mass and visceral adiposity. The degree of muscle-based losses varied widely; no study reported objective physical function outcomes. Within the incretin groups across agents and measurement methods, the median proportion of total weight loss attributable to reductions in muscle-based indices was 28.3% (IQR, 15.9% to 39.9%), with 65% exceeding the benchmark of about 25%; among studies using BIA or DXA, the median was about 29% (IQR, 16.6% to 43.1%) of total weight loss, with 67% exceeding the 25% benchmark, and in studies using CT or MRI, the median was about 25.3% (IQR, 16.7% to 27.2%), two thirds exceeding the 15% benchmark. In contrast, the 13 studies reporting weight loss in the lifestyle or placebo comparator groups accounted for a median weight loss of -2.5% (IQR, -4.5% to -0.9%), 38% of which exceeded the respective benchmark. LIMITATION: Heterogeneous body composition methods and reporting precluded meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Loss of muscle-related indices exceeded prespecified benchmarks in about two thirds of incretin-based interventions and in nearly half of nonpharmacologic interventions that produced weight loss. Future trials are needed to better understand mechanisms underlying these changes and their clinical implications. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None. (Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S3A5E).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.