Host transcriptional responses identify putative diagnostic biomarkers for bovine tuberculosis in cattle and buffalo
Rattachement africain : it, gb, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis, remains a major zoonosis impacting livestock productivity and public health. To characterize species-specific immune responses and identify transcriptional biomarkers of infection, we quantified the expression of 45 immune-related genes in peripheral blood from naturally infected cattle and Mediterranean buffalo. Differential and multivariate analyses revealed distinct species- and state-specific transcriptional signatures. Sixteen genes were significantly modulated in cattle, with Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA) defining a promising diagnostic signature marked by upregulation of IFNG, CASP8, CASP1, and CD83, and downregulation of IL10, CXCR2, and MMP9. In buffaloes, 22 genes were differently expressed across the three clinical groups. The first canonical function (Can1), driven positively by IFNG and IL12B and negatively by MMP9 and TLR5, effectively separated healthy from infected and affected animals, while the second function (Can2) distinguished the affected status through marked upregulation of CXCL1 and IL6. The species-specific immune signatures uncovered underscore the importance of developing tailored biomarker panels for improved diagnosis and surveillance of bTB in different livestock species.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Host transcriptional responses identify putative diagnostic biomarkers for bovine tuberculosis in cattle and buffalo
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.