Prospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Guideline-Based Therapy for Chronic Cough and Refractory Chronic Cough (PROCOUGH)
Résumé fourni par la source
Aim: Chronic cough is a common and burdensome condition with limited licensed therapies. Current guidelines recommend identifying treatable traits and using off-label therapies based largely on small clinical trials, but the real-world effectiveness of this approach remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-based therapies on objective and patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic cough attending a tertiary cough clinic. Methods: PROCOUGH was a prospective, single-centre, observational cohort study conducted at McMaster University Medical Centre (December 2021 to May 2025). Adults with chronic cough (>8 weeks) underwent comprehensive assessment, including lung function testing, airway inflammation measures, sputum cytology and 24-h cough monitoring (VitaloJAK™), alongside patient-reported outcomes. Patients were treated according to European Respiratory Society guideline recommendations, with all assessments repeated after a treatment trial. The primary outcome was change in 24-h cough frequency. Secondary outcomes included Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and Cough severity visual analogue scale (CS-VAS). Responder analyses were based on ≥30% cough frequency reduction, ≥30 mm CS-VAS improvement and ≥1.3-point LCQ increase. Results: 100 patients completed follow-up (mean±sd age 58.1±14.0 years; 58% female; median cough duration 7 years). Treatment resulted in a 54% reduction in 24-h cough frequency (95% CI 42.0-62.9%), a 20.2-mm decrease in CS-VAS (95% CI -26.2- -14.2) and a 3.4-point increase in LCQ (95% CI 2.6-4.2). Individually, 56%, 36% and 64% met cough frequency, CS-VAS and LCQ responder criteria, respectively, but only 14% met all three. Despite treatment, 71% reported insufficient cough control. Conclusion: Guideline-based therapy improves objective and subjective cough outcomes; however, most patients fail to achieve satisfactory symptom control, highlighting a substantial unmet need for effective treatments for refractory unexplained chronic cough.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-based therapy for chronic cough and refractory chronic cough: PROCOUGH
- Date Crossref
- 16/04/2026
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.