Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Prospective Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Guideline-Based Therapy for Chronic Cough and Refractory Chronic Cough (PROCOUGH)

3Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Aim: Chronic cough is a common and burdensome condition with limited licensed therapies. Current guidelines recommend identifying treatable traits and using off-label therapies based largely on small clinical trials, but the real-world effectiveness of this approach remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-based therapies on objective and patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic cough attending a tertiary cough clinic. Methods: PROCOUGH was a prospective, single-centre, observational cohort study conducted at McMaster University Medical Centre (December 2021 to May 2025). Adults with chronic cough (>8 weeks) underwent comprehensive assessment, including lung function testing, airway inflammation measures, sputum cytology and 24-h cough monitoring (VitaloJAK™), alongside patient-reported outcomes. Patients were treated according to European Respiratory Society guideline recommendations, with all assessments repeated after a treatment trial. The primary outcome was change in 24-h cough frequency. Secondary outcomes included Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and Cough severity visual analogue scale (CS-VAS). Responder analyses were based on ≥30% cough frequency reduction, ≥30 mm CS-VAS improvement and ≥1.3-point LCQ increase. Results: 100 patients completed follow-up (mean±sd age 58.1±14.0 years; 58% female; median cough duration 7 years). Treatment resulted in a 54% reduction in 24-h cough frequency (95% CI 42.0-62.9%), a 20.2-mm decrease in CS-VAS (95% CI -26.2- -14.2) and a 3.4-point increase in LCQ (95% CI 2.6-4.2). Individually, 56%, 36% and 64% met cough frequency, CS-VAS and LCQ responder criteria, respectively, but only 14% met all three. Despite treatment, 71% reported insufficient cough control. Conclusion: Guideline-based therapy improves objective and subjective cough outcomes; however, most patients fail to achieve satisfactory symptom control, highlighting a substantial unmet need for effective treatments for refractory unexplained chronic cough.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.

Titre Crossref
Prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-based therapy for chronic cough and refractory chronic cough: PROCOUGH
Date Crossref
16/04/2026
Éditeur
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Respiratory and Cough-Related ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.