Detecting entanglement from few partial transpose moments and their decay via weight enumerators
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract In light of the rapid experimental development of quantum devices, tools for estimating quantum properties, particularly entanglement, must be improved to keep pace. The p 3 -PPT criterion is an experimentally viable relaxation of the well-known positive partial transposition (PPT) criterion for the certification of quantum entanglement. Recently, it has been generalized to various families of entanglement criteria based on the PT moments p k = Tr [ ( ρ Γ ) k ] , where ρ Γ denotes the partially transposed density matrix of a quantum state ρ . While most of these generalizations are strictly more powerful than the p 3 -PPT criterion, their m -th level versions usually rely on the availability of p k for all moment orders k ⩽ m . Here, we show that one can alternatively compare any three PT moments of orders k < l < m , which can significantly reduce experimental overheads. More precisely, we show that any state satisfying p l > p k x p m 1 − x must be entangled, where x = ( m − l ) / ( m − k ) . Using the example of locally depolarized Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states, a family of states that has been used as a test for the quantum character of large-scale states prepared on quantum computers, we identify the most promising versions of these three-moment criteria and compare their performance with a broad range of entanglement criteria. In the case of globally depolarized stabilizer states, we prove that having access to
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Detecting entanglement from few partial transpose moments and their decay via weight enumerators
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2026
- Éditeur
- IOP Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.