Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Intrawound Tobramycin Plus Vancomycin to Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Tibial Fractures

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
64Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, gb, co. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Importance: Previous research has suggested that intrawound vancomycin powder reduces deep surgical site infections among patients with periarticular tibial fractures at high risk of infection. It is unknown whether the addition of tobramycin powder further decreases infection rates. Objective: To compare whether the combination of tobramycin plus vancomycin vs vancomycin alone delivered as intrawound powder at the time of definitive fixation reduces deep surgical site infections. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label, assessor-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted at 39 US trauma centers. Eligible patients were adults with an operatively treated periarticular tibial fracture (either tibial plateau or pilon) who met 1 of 3 criteria for elevated infection risk. Enrollment occurred between June 18, 2021, and December 12, 2024 (final follow-up, July 15, 2025). Interventions: Intrawound tobramycin (1.2 g) plus vancomycin (1.0 g) powder vs intrawound vancomycin (1.0 g) powder delivered at the time of definitive fixation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a deep surgical site infection requiring surgical management within 182 days of definitive fracture fixation. Secondary outcomes included deep surgical site infections with pathogens that were gram-negative only, deep surgical site infections with at least 1 pathogen that was gram-positive, deep surgical site infections with polymicrobial cultures, deep surgical site infections with negative culture results, and cellulitis or skin infections treated only with antibiotics. Results: Among the 1660 participants randomized, 1528 (mean age, 47.0 [SD, 14.3] years; 603 female [39.5%]; 925 male [60.5%]) were included in the primary analysis. Deep surgical site infections occurred in 51 of 753 participants (182-day probability, 7.4%) in the tobramycin plus vancomycin group and 47 of 775 participants (182-day probability, 6.6%) in the vancomycin alone group (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% bayesian credible interval, 0.75-1.66; posterior probability of superiority, 29.7%). The threshold required for superiority was not reached for any secondary outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with operatively treated periarticular tibial fractures at high risk of infection, adding intrawound tobramycin powder to vancomycin powder at the time of definitive fixation did not reduce deep surgical site infections compared with vancomycin powder alone. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02227446.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Intrawound Tobramycin Plus Vancomycin to Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Tibial Fractures
Date Crossref
12/05/2026
Éditeur
American Medical Association (AMA)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

University of Maryland, BaltimoreJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaVanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity of KentuckyUniversity of Oklahoma Medical CenterMethodist HospitalIndiana University – Purdue University IndianapolisDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical CenterBrigham and Women's HospitalHarvard UniversityWalter Reed National Military Medical CenterLoyola University Medical CenterCarolinas Medical CenterLoma Linda UniversityAtrium Health Wake Forest BaptistBaylor Scott & White HealthCedars-Sinai Medical CenterCorewell HealthHarvard University PressBrighton and Sussex Medical SchoolHennepin Healthcare Research InstituteNew York Hospital QueensPresbyterian HospitalInova Fairfax HospitalLouisiana State UniversityThe University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonMedical University of South CarolinaMetroHealthMetroHealth Medical CenterPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterOregon Health & Science UniversityUniversity of California, IrvineIrvine UniversityUniversity of PittsburghMedStar HealthJohns Hopkins HospitalGeorgetown UniversityRhode Island HospitalSt. Mary's Medical CenterTemple University HospitalRobert Wood Johnson FoundationTexas Tech UniversityTexas Tech University Health Sciences CenterThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamThe University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science CenterUniversity of UtahAurora UniversityUniversity of Colorado DenverSchiller International UniversityJackson Memorial HospitalUniversity of Mississippi Medical CenterMaimonides Medical CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversity of Virginia Medical CenterUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonFundación Santa Fe de BogotáWright State UniversityVirginia Commonwealth UniversityUniversity of the SciencesUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia University

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Orthopedic Infections and TreatmentsBone fractures and treatmentsSurgical site infection prevention

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.