Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation on Functional Capacity and Postoperative Complications in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated multimodal perioperative prehabilitation-combining exercise, nutrition, and psychological interventions-on functional capacity (6MWT distance, reflecting cardiopulmonary fitness) and clinical outcomes (postoperative complications, hospital stay, mortality, and readmission rates) in gastrointestinal cancer surgery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 prospective trials (n=1229) identified via the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from their inception to March 20, 2025. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 and Q tests; random- or fixed-effects models were applied. RESULTS: Multimodal prehabilitation significantly improved the 6MWT preoperatively [mean difference (MD): 30.1 m; 95% CI: 14.8-45.4] and at 4 weeks (MD: 21.5 m; 95% CI: 14.1-28.9) and 8 weeks postoperatively (MD: 38.7 m; 95% CI: 1.9-75.4). It was associated with a 0.86-day (95% CI: -1.43 to -0.30) shorter hospital stay and lowered overall [risk ratio (RR) 0.67; 95% CI: 0.57-0.79] and severe complications (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.97), with no effect on operative time, mortality, or readmission. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients receiving multimodal prehabilitation achieve better functional recovery (6MWT) and fewer complications, supporting its integration into perioperative care.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation on Functional Capacity and Postoperative Complications in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery
- Date Crossref
- 10/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.