Synchronous Double Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) are the most common and second most common primary liver cancers, respectively. In contrast, double primary hepatic cancer (DPHC), the synchronous occurrence of these two tumors in different locations of the liver, is an uncommon pathology, occurring in less than 0.8% of all liver malignancies. CASE PRESENTATION: A man in his 70s was referred to our department for the treatment of multiple liver tumors. He had previously been treated with a direct-acting antiviral agent for chronic liver disease due to hepatitis C virus infection and alcohol consumption. His carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin levels were 36058 U/mL and 159 mAU/mL, respectively. Imaging studies revealed two separate lesions with different contrast features in segments VIII (SVIII, 2.5 cm in size) and IV/II/III (SIV/II/III, 3.5 cm). Therefore, the preoperative diagnosis was DPHC, consistent with HCC in SVIII and iCCA in SIV/II/III. The patient underwent an extended left hemihepatectomy with regional lymph node dissection and cholecystectomy, and DPHC was confirmed histologically. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate diagnoses and appropriate therapeutic strategies are essential for patients presenting with multiple liver tumors showing heterogeneous imaging features and elevated CA19-9 levels.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Synchronous Double Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Japan Surgical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.