Proximate composition and sensory evaluation of gluten-free bar formulated from rice and soybean flour
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: The growing prevalence of celiac disease and gluten intolerance is driving up the need for gluten-free food choices suitable for both adults and children. Objective: This research evaluates the formulation of a gluten-free bar, utilizing rice flour, soybean flour, or a composite blend, with other enriching elements. Methods: Five different gluten-free bars were prepared from varying ratios of rice and soybean flour, and their proximate composition, colorimetric, and sensory properties were compared to wheat-based control bar. Results: The sensory analysis revealed that the formulation with 10% soybean and 30% rice blend ratio showed an overall higher acceptability score over the other formulations and compared to the control bar (total mean score = 45.72 and 42.94, respectively). Moreover, it has a favorable proximate composition of 10.5% protein, 4.6% fiber, and only 19.9% fat content compared to other formulations. The 40% rice flour formulation had the least sensory and chemical attributes compared to other formulations. Conclusions: The 10:30 soybean-rice formulation with fortifying ingredients achieved superior consumer acceptability while maintaining an optimal proximate profile, establishing an evidence-based benchmark for the industrial scale-up of high-protein, gluten-free bars. However, further research is required to optimize shelf-life stability for commercial distribution.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Proximate composition and sensory evaluation of gluten-free bar formulated from rice and soybean flour
- Date Crossref
- 14/04/2026
- Éditeur
- PeerJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.