Stabilizing Extreme Few‐Shot ECG Classification via Self‐Supervised Contrastive Pretraining
Résumé fourni par la source
In clinical electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis, high-quality annotations are expensive and difficult to scale, leaving many tasks in an extreme few-shot learning regime. We formulate a single-label Top-5 rhythm classification task on PTB-XL and strictly limit supervised training to N = 70 labeled samples (14 per class) to characterize failure modes of scratch training and assess the stabilizing effect of self-supervised learning (SSL). We first perform SimCLR-style contrastive pretraining with the NT-Xent loss on 16,304 unlabeled ECG recordings, followed by supervised fine-tuning. To isolate the independent contribution of SSL initialization, downstream augmentation is disabled (NoAug) in the core evaluation. Performance and stability are assessed using Macro-F1, best validation epoch, and a collapse rate defined as Best Epoch ≤ 1. Under N = 70, scratch training exhibits systematic early collapse (Macro-F1 = 0.115 ± 0.072; collapse rate = 66.7%), which is not alleviated by strong downstream augmentation alone (0.108 ± 0.042; 66.7%). In contrast, SSL fine-tuning without downstream augmentation improves Macro-F1 to 0.192 ± 0.003 and reduces the collapse rate to 0%, with markedly reduced inter-seed variance. A balanced N = 300 reference achieves Macro-F1 = 0.297 ± 0.018. These results indicate that, in extreme few-shot ECG classification, the primary bottleneck is training reproducibility rather than peak accuracy, and SSL contrastive pretraining provides a robust initialization that substantially mitigates collapse and improves usability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Stabilizing Extreme Few‐Shot ECG Classification via Self‐Supervised Contrastive Pretraining
- Date Crossref
- 12/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.