Immunohistochemical Analysis of Potential Therapeutic Targets PRAME , FOLR1 , and CLDN18.2 in Salivary Gland Carcinomas
Résumé fourni par la source
Salivary gland carcinomas are rare, heterogeneous, and often resistant to conventional treatments, highlighting the need for new therapeutic strategies. This retrospective study evaluated the expression of three immunologically relevant biomarkers-PRAME, FOLR1, and CLDN18.2-as potential therapeutic targets in salivary gland carcinomas. Tumor samples from 54 patients with seven histological subtypes treated at Saarland University Medical Center between 2013 and 2023 were analyzed using immunohistochemistry and scored with the Immunoreactive Score. PRAME was strongly expressed in 89% of cases, while FOLR1 and CLDN18.2 showed markedly lower expression at 41% and 6%, respectively. High PRAME expression was significantly associated with the presence of distant metastases, regardless of histological subtype. Patients with low PRAME expression tended to have improved overall survival, as indicated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log-Rank testing. These findings suggest PRAME as a promising immunotherapeutic and diagnostic target for salivary gland carcinomas, particularly through T-cell-based therapies already under investigation in other malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia. Further preclinical studies are needed to validate the functional and therapeutic significance of PRAME, FOLR1, and CLDN18.2 in this context.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Immunohistochemical Analysis of Potential Therapeutic Targets <scp>PRAME</scp> , <scp>FOLR1</scp> , and CLDN18.2 in Salivary Gland Carcinomas
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.