Optimising dry electrode processing formulation with improved rate capability and volumetric capacity for batteries
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Dry electrode processing to eliminate conventionally used toxic, combustible organic solvent n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) or any other solvent has gained interest due to its advantages of sustainability, cost reduction, and increasing electrode coating speed. However, there remains a need for understanding the dry electrode processing for relatively thick electrodes (≥70 µm), high mass loading (≥20 mg cm -2 ), and high active material proportion (≥94 wt%). Herein we study one of the key factors of materials composition for LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cathodes and scaling up the dry powder rheology from the lab to the pilot scale. We compare the morphology and electrochemical performance of the electrodes made by conventional slurry coating and by dry processing. The optimised dry-processed cathode (NMC811:C65: PTFE = 94:3:3) exhibited the most homogeneous microstructure, lower porosity, and the lowest impedance among the other formulations. The optimised dry-processed electrode exhibited higher volumetric capacity at 0.05 – 3 C, e.g. 640 and 521 mAh cm -3 at 0.05 and 1 C respectively, compared with the wet-processed electrode. The results demonstrate that balancing conductive additive and PTFE binder content to form a uniform carbon-binder network reduces polarisation and enables improved high-rate performance in dry-processed NMC811 cathodes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Optimising dry electrode processing formulation with improved rate capability and volumetric capacity for batteries
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.