Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 other

Translation and multi-site validation of the ‘Pediatric Complex Care Needs Assessment Scale’ (ACCAPED) from Italian to English

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : sa, om, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Few tools exist to assess the palliative care needs of children with serious illnesses. One such tool is the Pediatric Complex Care Needs Assessment scale (ACCAPED), developed by a group of pediatric palliative care experts in Italy. It evaluates care complexity across 11 clinical domains to categorize palliative care needs into three levels: low, moderate, and high. Aim This study aimed to translate and validate the Pediatric Complex Care Needs Assessment scale (ACCAPED) from Italian into English. Design The methodology included (1) translation, (2) expert panel validation, (3) end-user validation, (4) expert panel review, and (5) multi-site validation with a sample of children with various conditions and needs from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Oman (N = 199). Results During the translation and validation process, optimization strategies were employed to improve the scale’s psychometric properties, including adjusting the weighting of the clinical needs domain, modifying the complexity category thresholds, adding three items, and removing 16 items, thereby enhancing the scale’s construct validity. Using a regression model, factors such as mobilization, pain, instability, and skin integrity were identified as significant influences on expert judgments of patient complexity. Like the original, the translated English version contains 11 domains. Conclusion The English Modified-ACCAPED scale appears to be a practical tool for screening for palliative care needs in children with potentially life-limiting conditions and for guiding them early in their disease trajectory toward appropriate resources. However, future research is recommended to strengthen its psychometric properties.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.