The Effect of Underlying Neuropsychiatric Conditions on Blood Levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 in Children
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
While ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have demonstrated clinical relevance in evaluating traumatic brain injury (TBI), less is known about how underlying pediatric neurological or psychiatric diagnoses may influence baseline biomarker levels. Plasma samples from a pediatric biobank were analyzed for UCH-L1 and GFAP concentrations. Eligible participants were <19 years of age and had a documented diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, depression, or seizure disorder but no recent history of trauma, infectious illness, or other chronic medical conditions. Biomarker levels were compared (1) across diagnostic categories, (2) with a separate group of historic controls ( n = 216), and (3) with adult thresholds used to guide head CT use in mild TBI (UCH-L1 400 pg/mL; GFAP 35 pg/mL). Among 88 participants (median age 15 years), UCH-L1 and GFAP values remained relatively stable across conditions. There were no significant differences between diagnostic groups or compared with controls. Approximately 6.8% of children had GFAP levels above the adult threshold, whereas <3% exceeded the UCH-L1 threshold. Underlying neuropsychiatric conditions do not appear to meaningfully modify baseline circulating GFAP or UCH-L1 levels in children, suggesting that these conditions may not preclude the use of these biomarkers in the evaluation of pediatric TBI.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Effect of Underlying Neuropsychiatric Conditions on Blood Levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 in Children
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.