Body dysmorphic disorder and its negative impact on social and mental well-being among Jordanian university students
Résumé fourni par la source
Purpose This study aims to investigate how body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) impacts social and mental well-being and its dimensions among Jordanian university students. Design/methodology/approach The current study used a cross-sectional design and a convenience sample approach to collect data from public and private Jordanian university students. The collected data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), and SmartPLS-4 software was used for computational purposes. Findings This study’s results show a strong negative relationship between BDD and mental well-being, meaning higher BDD reduces mental well-being. Also, BDD has a moderate negative impact on social well-being, meaning that people with higher levels of BDD tend to report lower levels of social satisfaction and communication. Moreover, BDD negatively affects all dimensions of mental and social well-being. However, emotional well-being has the strongest negative relationship with BDD. Originality/value Our study revealed that BDD harms Jordanian university students’ social and mental well-being and its dimensions (family and close friends, supervisory and authoritative positions, emotional well-being and cognitive well-being), with primarily negative impacts on emotional well-being. Also, this study demonstrates the requirement for selected interventions to minimize BDD’s adverse mental and social well-being effects using specific strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Body dysmorphic disorder and its negative impact on social and mental well-being among Jordanian university students
- Date Crossref
- 09/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Emerald
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.