Mild cognitive impairment‐to‐Alzheimer's dementia progression risk: the contribution of the Interceptor project
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate stage between normal and pathological brain aging, with 30% to 50% progressing to dementia within 3 to 5 years. Early identification of individuals at high risk of progression is crucial for public health strategies. METHODS: The INTERCEPTOR project included 398 MCI individuals. Baseline assessment included harmonized procedures for sociodemographic, clinical, neuropsychological, genetic (apolipoprotein E), cerebrospinal fluid (amyloid beta tau), electroencephalogram (brain connectivity), magnetic resonance imaging (hippocampal volumetry), and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. The baseline and follow-up were completed by 351 individuals with MCI with neuropsychological tests every 6 months for 3 years. RESULTS: Dementia developed in 104 individuals (29.6%), including 85 (22.4%) who met core clinical criteria for probable and possible Alzheimer's disease dementia. A Cox model combining clinical and sociodemographic data achieved a concordance index of 72%, which increased to 82% when neuropsychology and biomarkers were added. DISCUSSION: The INTERCEPTOR nomogram represents a tool for predicting dementia progression risk, supporting public health strategies, including screening for risk assessment and risk/benefit ratio in innovative treatments.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Mild cognitive impairment‐to‐Alzheimer's dementia progression risk: the contribution of the <i>Interceptor</i> project
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.