Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Demystifying AI: The urgency of a critical stance on the use of AI systems in education

1Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract The education field has generally embraced artificial intelligence (AI) systems for their (undocumented) potential to reduce teacher workload, address inequalities, and enhance learning through personalization. However, issues such as algorithmic bias, monoculturalism, discrimination, use of private data, and access to AI systems raise concerns about exacerbating learning inequalities, especially for minority students. We argue that researchers in education have largely failed to critically address the limitations of AI systems, and that a critical stance framed within critical AI literacies is urgently needed to ensure responsible use, if any, of AI systems in the classroom. We first examine how AI systems have been conceptualized for educational purposes. Through engagement with related literature, we discuss what has been overlooked by the mystifying of AI and the failure to engage more thoroughly and critically with existing literature on the social nature of learning. Following that, we provide an overview of contemporary AI literacy frameworks through a comparative approach and discuss their potential and limitations. We conclude with a set of recommendations for future research, teacher education, and curriculum design, framed within a critical stance to foster fair, ethical, and responsible use, where appropriate, of AI systems in education.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Demystifying AI: The urgency of a critical stance on the use of AI systems in education
Date Crossref
08/04/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningTeaching and Learning Programming

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.