Knowledge, Attitude and Practice regarding Menstrual cup Use among Medical and Paramedical Students and Staffs: A Cross-Sectional Study from Eastern India
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Menstrual cups are a safe and sustainable option for menstrual hygiene management, yet their uptake remains limited in India. Aims & Objectives: To assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding menstrual cup use among medical and paramedical students and staff at a tertiary medical college in Odisha, Eastern India. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted among females aged 18–45 years using simple random sampling. Data were collected through a semi-structured questionnaire administered via Epicollect-5. Knowledge was measured using a nine-item score and categorized as poor, average, or good. Attitudes and practices were assessed using structured questions. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0. Results: Of 582 approached, 538 were analyzed. Awareness was reported by 79%, but only 15.6% demonstrated good knowledge. MBBS students had significantly higher knowledge scores than Allied Health Sciences participants (5.15 ± 1.93 vs. 2.93 ± 2.68; p < 0.001), while the latter expressed more favorable attitudes. Sanitary pads were the predominant product (96.9%), and only 2.2% reported current MC use. Conclusion: Despite high awareness, menstrual cup use remains low. Targeted educational and behavior change interventions are warranted to improve knowledge and MC use.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Knowledge, Attitude and Practice regarding Menstrual cup Use among Medical and Paramedical Students and Staffs: A Cross-Sectional Study from Eastern India
- Date Crossref
- 28/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Indian Association of Preventive and Social Medicine
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.