Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were excluded from major trials of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). AIM: The objective of this study was to describe this population and evaluate outcomes after LAAO in patients with and without HFrEF. METHODS: Patients with and without HFrEF undergoing LAAO were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2020. Outcomes of interest were major in-hospital adverse events (death, stroke, pericardial effusion, tamponade, pericardial window, transfusion) and 6-month readmissions (any readmission, heart failure readmission, death/stroke readmission). To account for differences between patients with and without HFrEF, outcomes were evaluated using risk-adjusted logistic regression models and risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: -VASC score was 3.8 ± 1.3 in the HFrEF group and 3.7 ± 1.4 in those without HFrEF. HFrEF was associated with a higher risk of composite in-hospital major adverse events (6.0% vs. 5.0%, adjusted OR 1.23 [95% CI 1.09-1.40], p = 0.001) and a higher risk of 6-month all-cause readmission (adjusted HR 1.18 [95% CI 1.08-1.28], p < 0.001), heart failure readmission (adjusted HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.46-1.72], p < 0.001), and readmission with death or stroke (adjusted HR 1.27 [95% CI 1.03-1.57], p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: One out of nine patients treated with LAAO in the United States has HFrEF, which is associated with a higher risk of major in-hospital complications and hospital readmission.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
- Date Crossref
- 07/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.